THE GREAT RESET: RESTORING MEMBER STATE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. A TWO SCENARIO PROPOSAL THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL REFORM FOR A NEW EU FROM MATHIAS CORVINUS COLLEGIUM AND ORDO IURIS INSTITUTE: A Two Scenario Proposal Through Institutional Reform for a New EU From Mathias Corvinus Collegium and Ordo Iuris Institute

Rodrigo Ballester; Damille  Devenyi; Jerzy Kwaśniewski; Jarosław  Lindenberg; Zbigniew Przybyłowski

doi:10.37873/OIPress.54

The Great Reset: Restoring Member State Sovereignty in the European Union

A Two Scenario Proposal Through Institutional Reform for a New EU From Mathias Corvinus Collegium and Ordo Iuris Institute

Rodrigo Ballester

Damille Devenyi

Jerzy Kwaśniewski

Jarosław Lindenberg

Zbigniew Przybyłowski

Seria: Raporty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37873/OIPress.54

Słowa kluczowe: sovereignty, European Union

Opublikowane: 12 czerwca 2025

Pliki do pobrania

PDF

More than 70 years ago, when six Western countries established the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), few could have predicted that it would evolve into one of the world’s most powerful international organizations – one with its own currency, diplomatic core, administrative apparatus, parliament, autonomous legal order, and even a constitutional court capable of striking down national laws and imposing financial sanctions on non-compliant Member States. Yet, this transformation occurred: Over time, a single organization became three—the ECSC, the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), and the European Economic Community (EEC)—which collectively became known as the European Communities. These, in turn, evolved into what is now the European Union. What began as a relatively straightforward vision of free trade, travel and peaceful coexistence among states has culminated in an ambitious project aimed at laying the “building blocks of the new world order”, with virtually every aspect of governance in Europe today shaped by the EU in some capacity.

It is widely acknowledged that the EU today faces existential crisis. Some argue that the solution lies in “more Europe” and advocate for “speeding up the integration process”—essentially, euphemisms for further federalization. However, integration has been accelerating for decades, and not only has it failed to prevent the current crisis, but it has also instigated it. In our view, the answer lies elsewhere: in a return to the founding principles of the European project. The focus should not be on “EU sovereignty”, but national sovereignty; not judicial legislation imposed by a supranational court of unelected judges, but on the rule of law; not on the dominance of technocratic institutions, but on representative democracy; not on centralization, but subsidiarity; not on imposed regulations, but on the free market; and not on ideological censorship, but on freedom of speech.

Bickerton Ch. J., Hodson D., Puetter U., The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era, Journal of Common Market Studies 2015, vol. 53, issue 4, p. 703.

Burgess M., Federalism and the European Union: the Building of Europe 1950–2000, Routledge 2000, pp. 28–29.

Cini M., The European Commission: An Unelected Legislator?, Journal of Legislative Studies 2002, 8(4), p. 14 and 16.

Costa O., Magnette P., The European Union as a Consociation? A Methodological Assessment, West European Politics 2003, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 11.

Dashwood A., The Relationship between the Member States and the European Union/Community, Common Market Law Review, vol. 41, Issue 2 (2004), p. 356.

“Digital Services Act” (Regulation EU 2022/2065), Para. 12 of the preamble of the regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services.

ECRI revised General Policy Recommendation No. 5, European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, adopted on 16 March 2000, revised on 8 December 2021.

Engels D., The European Union and the Decline of the West, or: Determinism or Determination?, “Erträge” 5/2017, pp. 93–124.

European Parliament resolution of 22 November 2023 on proposals of the European Parliament for the amendment of the Treaties (2022/2051(INL)).

EU: Going Full Orwell :: Gatestone Institute, https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13532/eu-full-orwell (09.01.2025).

EU debate on qualified majority voting in the Common Foreign and Security Policy, OSW commentary 2023, https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2023-10-12/eu-debate-qualified-majority-voting-common-foreign-and (22.11.2024).

Føllesdal A., Hix S., Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik, Journal of Common Market Studies (2006), Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 533–562.

Gastelaars M., de Ruijter A. (eds.), A United Europe: The Quest for a Multifaceted Identity, University of Utrecht 1998.

Havel V., Is There a European Identity, Is There a Europe?, Project Syndicate 2000, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/is-there-a-european-identity–is-there-a-europe?barrier=accesspaylog.

Hinarejos A., Judicial Control in the European Union: Reforming Jurisdiction in the Intergovernmental Pillars, Oxford 2009, pp. 1–13.

Hoeksma J., The democratic legitimacy of the European Union, The Loop - The European Consortium for Political Research Political Science Blog (2023), https://theloop.ecpr.eu/the-democratic-legitimacy-of-the-european-union/ (22.11.2024).

Institut Thomas More, Principes, institutions, compétences. Recentrer l’Union européenne, Paris 2019, pp. 6, 13–15, 17, 22, 28, 30.

Innerarity D., Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic?, LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper 77, European Institute 2014.

Jacobs D., Maier R., European Identity: Construct, Fact and Fiction, in: M. Gastelaars, A. de Ruijter (eds.), A United Europe: The Quest for a Multifaceted Identity, University of Utrecht 1998, pp. 13–34.

Kawczyńska M., The Court of Justice of the European Union as a law-maker: enhancing integration or acting ultra vires?, in: M. Florczak-Wątor (ed.), Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts, London–New York, pp. 203–220.

Keohane R. O., Nye J. S., The Club Model of Multi-lateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, paper for the APSA, Washington D.C., August 31–September 3, 2000, p. 2.

Kielmansegg P. G., Integration und Demokratie, in: M. Jachtenfuchs, B. Kohler-Koch (eds.), Europäische Integration, Wiesbaden 1996, pp. 49–76.

LSE Europe in Question Discussion Paper 77 – see Innerarity D.

Mair P., Popular Democracy and EU Enlargement, East European Politics and Societies 2003, 17(1), p. 62.

Metsola R., EP President Roberta Metsola, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220429IPR28222/italy-s-prime-minister-draghi-calls-for-faster--eu-integration-to-address-crises.

Mora-Sanguinetti J. S., Quintana J., Soler I., Spruk R., Sector-Level Economic Effects of Regulatory Complexity: Evidence from Spain, Banco de España 2023, pp. 20–21.

Müller J. W., The Promise of Demoicracy: Diversity and Domination in the European Public Order, in: J. Neyer, A. Wiener (eds.), The Political Theory of the European Union, Oxford 2011.

Nicolaïdis K., European Demoicracy and Its Crisis, Journal of Common Market Studies 2012, Vol. 51, No. 2, p. 351.

Nicolaïdis K., Our European Demoïcracy: Is this Constitution a Third Way for Europe?, in: K. Nicolaïdis, S. Weatherill (eds.), Whose Europe?, 2003, pp. 137–152.

OP v Commune d’Ans, CJEU Judgment of 28 November 2023, Case C-148/22.

O. G. O. do Roy, Rules Without End: EU’s Reluctance to Let Go of Regulation, European Centre for International Political Economy 2024, https://ecipe.org/blog/rules-without-end-eu-regulation/.

Pekel J., Europeana: Building a European Identity, University of Amsterdam 2011 (Master Thesis), p. 24.

Plottka J., Müller M., Enhancing the EU’s Democratic Legitimacy, Institut für Europäische Politik 2020, pp. 9, 12.

Preuß U. K., Europa als politische Gemeinschaft, in: G. F. Schuppert, I. Pernice, U. Haltern (eds.), Europawissenschaft, Baden-Baden 2005, pp. 489–539.

Regulation no. 2020/2092, Art. 4(1) – conditionality for the protection of the Union budget.

Regulation no. (EU) 2024/1348, Art. 10(1) and 51(2) – common procedure for international protection.

Reho F. O., Subsidiarity in the EU: Reflections on a Centre–Right Agenda, European View 18/1 (2019), p. 10.

Report of Franco-German Working Group on EU Institutional Reform, Paris-Berlin 2023, pp. 21–29.

Salihu S., Sovereignty and Integration in the European Union: Reduction or Unification and Strengthening?, The Review of European Affairs 2023, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 70.

“Sargentini Report”, 11 September 2018, https://eu-brusszel.mfa.gov.hu/assets/23/13/07/675d7452ea8b2d816844a3fb15665406f05b6c50.pdf.

Schepelle K. L., Kochenov D. V., Grabowska-Moroz B., EU Values Are Law, after All, Yearbook of European Law 2020, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 10, 13.

Scharpf F. W., Legitimationskonzepte jenseits des Nationalstaates, in: G. F. Schuppert, I. Pernice, U. Haltern (eds.), Europawissenschaft, Baden-Baden 2005, pp. 705–742.

Schütze R., From Dual to Cooperative Federalism, Oxford 2009, pp. 13–74.

Shehaj A., How Is a European Identity Significant to the Future of the European Union?, Open Democracy, 2015.

Springford J., Europe must choose: Multiculturalism or stagnation?, Centre for European Reform 2024, p. 5, https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/insight_JS_demo_9.5.24%20%281%29.pdf (22.11.2024).

Sträth B., A European Identity: To the Historical Limits of a Concept, European Journal of Social Theory 2002, 5(4), pp. 387–401.

Tekiner U., The ‘European (Union) Identity’: An Overview, e-International Relations 2020, https://www.e-ir.info/2020/04/15/the-european-union-identity-an-overview/ (22.11.2024).

Uhma P., The democratic legitimacy of the European Union and its laws: theoretical challenges and practical examples, „Rocznik Administracji Publicznej” 2023 (9), pp. 312–314, 317.

Van Middelaar L., Pourquoi forger un récit européen?, in: A. Arjakovsky (dir.), Histoire de la conscience européenne, Editions Salvator, Collège des Bernardins, 2016, pp. 31–56.

Wallace W., Less than a Federation, More than a Regime: The Community as a Political System, in: H. Wallace et al. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Community, 1983, p. 403 et seq.

Zürn M., Politicization compared: at national, European, and global levels, Journal of European Public Policy (2019), Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 977–995.

Pobrania

Dane do pobrania nie są jeszcze dostępne.

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Miedzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Ballester, R. (2025) The Great Reset: Restoring Member State Sovereignty in the European Union: A Two Scenario Proposal Through Institutional Reform for a New EU From Mathias Corvinus Collegium and Ordo Iuris Institute. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Instytutu na rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris (Raporty). doi:10.37873/OIPress.54.